Lucky Ladies Blackjack
Posted on by admin
| 1 vote (12.5%) | |
| 2 votes (25%) | |
| No votes (0%) | |
| 5 votes (62.5%) |
8 members have voted
Lucky Ladies Lucky Ladies is a simple blackjack game from Galaxy Gaming that combines the traditional game of blackjack with a fun side bet. This game has a special card – the Queen of Hearts, also known here as the lucky ladies!
- For example, Lucky Ladies pays different amounts for Two Queen of Hearts and a dealer BJ, Two Queen of Hearts, a matched 20 (two identical cards adding to 20), a suited 20 and an unsuited 20. Also note that some side bets have a fixed or maximum bet amount, a capped payout or a bet size relative to the main bet.
- Canterbury Basic Training teaches you how to play two Blackjack side bets, TriLux Bonus and Lucky Lucky.
- Of all the currently available side bets for blackjack, the news that Lucky Ladies (LL) is vulnerable to card counting has been out the longest. The reason is simple: LL pays for any player total of 20, so ten-valued cards are a premium. This is exactly the same situation the counter wants for the main game of blackjack.
Vlad3Tetes
Lucky Ladies — Pay Table B
HAND TABLE B
Q of hearts pair & dealer has BJ 1000 to 1
Q of hearts pair 200 to 1
Matched 20 (same rank and suit) 25 to 1
Suited 20 10 to 1
Unsuited 20 4 to 1
On a 6 deck game, WoO has this bet at 17%.
Using hi-lo, what TC is required to make this bet profitable. If insurance is +3, wouldn't this be the same or less?
Is there a count for lucky ladies specifically?
Hi-lo seems like it would be ok, but it seems there could be a more accurate count for this specific bet.
Does anyone have the numbers?
If there is a count for lucky ladies, is it more profitable than hi-lo in total? IE: varying only your lucky ladies bet.
Less heat, more?
This is meant to be the definitive guide to counting lucky ladies, so all information is appreciated, thanks.
HAND TABLE B
Q of hearts pair & dealer has BJ 1000 to 1
Q of hearts pair 200 to 1
Matched 20 (same rank and suit) 25 to 1
Suited 20 10 to 1
Unsuited 20 4 to 1
On a 6 deck game, WoO has this bet at 17%.
Using hi-lo, what TC is required to make this bet profitable. If insurance is +3, wouldn't this be the same or less?
Is there a count for lucky ladies specifically?
Hi-lo seems like it would be ok, but it seems there could be a more accurate count for this specific bet.
Does anyone have the numbers?
If there is a count for lucky ladies, is it more profitable than hi-lo in total? IE: varying only your lucky ladies bet.
Less heat, more?
This is meant to be the definitive guide to counting lucky ladies, so all information is appreciated, thanks.
RS
I believe TC is around 5 or 6 IIRC.
You can use the Archer count for LL (and also use Archer for insurance too!).
You can use the Archer count for LL (and also use Archer for insurance too!).
geoff
It's not even close to the index for insurance. Why would you think it was?
AxiomOfChoice
It's not even close to the index for insurance. Why would you think it was?
Because with insurance, one 10 pays 2-1. Here, two 10s pay 4-1. So it's the same....
(kidding....)Vlad3Tetes
While i do appreciate the comments...So far not too definitive guys...
For the sake of argument, pretend you are explaining it to a well endowed ape like man.
Axiom, you always seem to have the numbers, it's crunch time.
Is there a more accurate count for lucky ladies that can yield more profit than 'regular' counting?
If not, TC of hi-lo for LL.
Maybe if I pose it I the form of a math question.
TC?=$$$LL
Lol.
For the sake of argument, pretend you are explaining it to a well endowed ape like man.
Axiom, you always seem to have the numbers, it's crunch time.
Is there a more accurate count for lucky ladies that can yield more profit than 'regular' counting?
If not, TC of hi-lo for LL.
Maybe if I pose it I the form of a math question.
TC?=$$$LL
Lol.
teliot
http://apheat.net/2012/08/08/card-counting-the-lucky-ladies-blackjack-side-bet/
Or just use Google.
Or just use Google.
geoff
The reason I (and possibly other) haven't answered you is because the phrase 'lucky ladies sidecount' in google answers all of your questions. The first link is to Norm's book where he covers the LL sidebet and how it works with high low. How profitable it is and whether or not you should play it. The second link is to Elliot's site where he goes over similar information, but provides an actual sidecount developed specifically for LL.
If you just want a short answer then the answer is 7.
If you just want a short answer then the answer is 7.
AxiomOfChoice
While i do appreciate the comments...So far not too definitive guys...
For the sake of argument, pretend you are explaining it to a well endowed ape like man.
Axiom, you always seem to have the numbers, it's crunch time.
Is there a more accurate count for lucky ladies that can yield more profit than 'regular' counting?
If not, TC of hi-lo for LL.
Maybe if I lose it I the form I a math question.
TC?=$$$LL
Lol.
What teliot said.
All that matters here is the max bet. If the max is $25 per hand you can probably find something better. If you can bet $500 per hand you will probably do pretty well until they kick you out. My guess is it's the former.
An edge is worthless if you can't get the money down.
Vlad3Tetes
Thanks teliot, axiom and geoff.
While I appreciate the suggestion, I can search google for 'how to beat baccarat' and find that a simple martingale can take down the house.
I will take WoO and guys from here over google any day.
I will check the recommended readings, thanks for the link.
I have read that article teliot, it suggests more money can be made counting lucky ladies than a 'regular' count.
Is this backed mathematically? It seems like that might be true if you are working with a lower bankroll.
While I appreciate the suggestion, I can search google for 'how to beat baccarat' and find that a simple martingale can take down the house.
I will take WoO and guys from here over google any day.
I will check the recommended readings, thanks for the link.
I have read that article teliot, it suggests more money can be made counting lucky ladies than a 'regular' count.
Is this backed mathematically? It seems like that might be true if you are working with a lower bankroll.
teliot
Play Blackjack For Free
Is this backed mathematically?
I just make stuff up (that's my blog) to scare casinos so they'll hire me to give them advice they don't need.Lucky Ladies Blackjack Mohegan Sun
Try plugging 'card counting Lucky Ladies' into the Google.Play Lucky Ladies Blackjack Online
Visit my YouTube Channel: @AdvancedAdvantagePlay